TakkaTakkaTakka Kthunk

There was a time when the rhythm:

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTak KthunkKthunk

was what you grooved to when you typed. It was a rhythm that felt right as you created your missive, or term paper, or maybe the next great novel/short story/grocery list. If this sounds familiar to you, chances are you learned how to type on a manual or electric typewriter; those mysterious, sometimes beautiful machines that gave a very satisfying musicality to your typing. You were the Beethoven of the typewriter thanks to Mrs. Fortenberry (Sit up straight!) and her 5th period typing class.

The typewriter has evolved from a mechanism that clicks, dings, whirs, and kthunks, into a machine that resembles a glowing rectangle with a keyboard that isn’t directly connected (except perhaps by a wire). Instead of the immediate feedback you got when your words printed on paper, you now see them form as pixelated representations on a monitor. The pixelated representations are otherwise known as fonts. Fonts existed before computers, of course, but their electronic representations have changed them in some ways.

What’s different? The difference between tyepwriter and computer fonts is the difference between monospaced (typewriter) and proportional (computer) fonts. Each character in a monospaced font has the same width. The size of a character in a proportional font can vary depending upon what is being represented. It is because of this difference that one of the most hotly debated issues in desktop publishing arose.

How many spaces do you put at the end of a sentence?

The common practice when typing on a typewriter was to put two spaces (KthunkKthunk) after a sentence’s final punctuation. This provided a visual break for readers between sentences. Now that desktop publishing programs (such as Microsoft Word) primarily use proportional fonts, one space (kthunk) provides the same amount of visual break as did the two spaces on a typewriter. So, you only need to put one space at the end of a sentence.

I first became aware of this change thanks to author Robin Williams’ 1995 book The Mac is Not a Typewriter. Since becoming aware of the difference, it has been my practice to follow the rule and use only one space at the end of a sentence. Educating and/or convincing others of this change in typing has not always been easy. In fact, a discussion of this very issue is what inspired the creation of the “Tech Writer Fight Club.”

The person in question could not accept that things had changed and that she should no longer put two spaces after a period. I took the time to explain to her why the common style choice was to use only one space. I provided documentation from other sources, including our company style guide. As she joined the discussion, the volume in her voice went up to 11, and she stated that she had always put two spaces at the end of a sentence and always-would-no-matter-what. If we (the technical editors) wanted to remove the extra space, that was up to us. That was, in fact, what we got paid for anyway, right?

Well, yes, it is.

I was admittedly surprised by her reaction. I’ve never had anyone react quite so strongly to a mere editing suggestion. At that time a space-after-sentence death match wasn’t really an option. So one search-and-replace process later, the extra spaces were removed. I’m told by others (I no longer work at that particular place) that she still adds the two spaces at the end of each sentence. She probably still has a rotary phone at home as well.

If you research the issue, you’ll find that the debate is still rather heated. I’ve read many discussions on both sides of the issue. However, when the Chicago Manual of Style, the Modern Language Association, and the AP Style Guide all recommend that you only use one space at the end of a sentence, that is what I’m going to do. In section 2.12 of the Chicago Manual of Style it states:

A single character space, not two spaces, should be left after periods at the ends of sentences (both in manuscript and in final, published form) and after colons.

So, my suggestion to those who may get into a fight with someone about the extra space? Provide them with documentation of the reasons why the change has occurred. Send them to Grammar Girl’s website for the short and sweet explanation, or to Wikipedia for a lengthier discussion. If all of that fails? Use tact, and just remove the extra spaces later in the editorial process.

Dictionaries, style guides, and guides to grammar are regularly updated because the English language and its usage is constantly changing. It is a living language. Add constantly evolving technology into the mix, and the changes increase by a factor of 100. Use the guides to keep up with the changes, and you have the greatest chance of producing documentation that will best serve your audience. You may, on occasion, encounter someone that refuses to change. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t. It just means you may have to develop a thick skin.

Posted in Tech Writer Fight Club | Tagged | Comments Off

Doctor Who Old & New

The first Doctor Who book I read

I have been a Doctor Who fan since 1981. I first got hooked on the show, as it happens, from reading some of the Target novelizations of the Tom Baker stories. A friend had loaned several to me. She thought I’d like them; she was right!

The first one I read was Doctor Who and the Robots of Death. Mystery. Intrigue. Robots! And a madman who wore a multicolored, giant scarf and had a time-traveling “police call box.” How could I resist? The story that really got me hooked for good was  Doctor Who and the Genesis of the Daleks. I read the book, and then found an album that was a narrated recording of the show. After that I was ready to get my own long scarf, start bothering Alabama Public Television to show Doctor Who, and find other people that liked the show as much as I did.

Genesis of the Daleks

I eventually met a few people who had some Doctor Who stories on tape (Betamax even). The first one we watched was The Time Warrior. Probably one of the best ones I’ve ever seen; definitely a long-time favorite. Of course, they also had Genesis of the Daleks on tape. And once again that is the story that hooked me like a Gumblejack on a scifi-baited line.

I thus became a big fan of what is now referred to as the Classic series. I went to the conventions. I formed a club (no longer in existence), joined another club (still in operation), formed another club (now defunct) in another city , and generally became a lifelong fan.

When the original series run of the show ended in 1989, it was a sad day indeed. Like so many fans the world over, I remained hopeful that another season of Doctor Who was just around the corner. It was a very long wait, but it finally came back in 2005. Finally there was new Doctor Who! Finally new shows to talk about with other fans. Not only were the old die-hard fans happy, but a new generation of fans began sprouting up all over. I delved into “new fandom” with Doctor Who: Podshock, Radio Free Skaro, and a few other podcasts; a medium new to me at the time.

The first time I saw some of the new shows was during a visit to Birmingham, AL. I went to a Doctor Who club party there. It was November, 2005, so my friends already had copies of most of the shows. Lucky for me, since I could see a lot of them in one go. At first I wasn’t sure how I felt about the new series. Most stories were resolved in one episode. I wasn’t a big fan of Rose, but I thought the whole cast worked very well together. Ultimately I really enjoyed the show and was excited to have new Doctor Who!

Matt Smith and Karen Gillan in Doctor Who

It is now six years later, and there is a third (or eleventh) Doctor, played by Matt Smith, in the Tardis. Steven Moffat, the author of some of my favorite “new series” Doctor Who stories, is now at the helm of Doctor Who as both writer and producer. Matt Smith is the best combination of classic and new Doctors yet. His first story is my favorite of new Doctor opening stories; I have watched it quite a few times. The fifth season is my overall favorite since 2005.

That being said, I feel as if the sixth season has lost its way a bit. There have been some high points (The Curse of the Black Spot, The Doctor’s Wife, and Let’s Kill Hitler) and there have been some low points (Night Terrors). I don’t think opening with the two part story was the best choice. I also don’t think choosing to film the season openers in the U.S. did anything for the show. I understand it was probably for marketing reasons. The reason the show is so well loved is because of its very British quality. It is an international show, but don’t try to Americanize it. Please?

I heard a comment once, I believe it may have been on Radio Free Skaro, that shows these days are written/produced with the idea that they will be watched as DVD box sets. I’m not sure how much I agree with that statement, but that is how I feel the sixth season has come together. The big mid-season break made it feel disjointed. The overall story arc does not have the same cohesion I felt that season five did. Watching all the stories in succession, such as when they are part of a DVD set, may give the series a discernible cohesion that is not apparent watching the episodes each week.

And I have to say, finding out River Song is the daughter of Rory and Amy gave me the same feeling as finding out that Darth Vader was Luke Skywalker’s dad. It just didn’t seem quite right. I liked it when there was more mystery about who she was. Sometimes I think secrets are better left as secrets.

Two stories remain in the season. I’m hopeful that everything will be tied together and perhaps we’ll understand where this was all going.

Posted in Doctor Who, Geek Out | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

I am Will’s Introduction

Greetings,

Welcome to Ubikto.com, the writing blog for Will Savage. This blog  combines information about my writing, writing life, reading, and whatever else seems to fit with all the rest. You won’t learn about what sort of sandwich I ate on any given day. Unless it was a really good sandwich.

Included in this blog will be anything that would’ve formerly fit at techwriterfightclub.com. I decided to consolidate and focus on this blog because, well, I wanted to be more focused.

Posted in About | Tagged , | Comments Off